These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648066)
1. Clinics selling embryos made for 'adoption'. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1997 Nov; ():1, 34. PubMed ID: 11648066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Babies from donated eggs: growing use stirs questions. Brozan N N Y Times Web; 1988 Jan; ():A1, A17. PubMed ID: 11647842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Trying to make money making 'test tube' babies. Blakeslee S N Y Times Web; 1987 May; ():F6. PubMed ID: 11647826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternative reproduction. Andrews LB; Douglass L South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):623-82. PubMed ID: 11645847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Babies for sale: market ethics and the new reproductive technologies. Hirschman EC J Consum Aff; 1991; 25(2):358-90. PubMed ID: 11660025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The stork market: the law of the new reproduction technologies. Andrews LB ABA J; 1984 Aug; 70(8):50-6. PubMed ID: 11658526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues. Field M Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial conception: legislative approaches. Krause HD Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Frozen embryos: moral, social, and legal implications. Wurmbrand MJ South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1079-100. PubMed ID: 11655851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In-vitro fertilization, embryo transfer, and embryo freezing. Halperin M Assia Jew Med Ethics; 1988 May; 1(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12083148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What should we do with surplus potential humans? Annas GJ Washington Post; 1985 Mar; ():K1, K5. PubMed ID: 11647789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law. Wadlington W Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bill to regulate fertility procedures gains in Italy. Stanley A N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A4. PubMed ID: 11648127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproductive technologies and the theology of the family. Rae SB; Core JH Ethics Med; 1994; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 11652747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice. Schenker JG; Frenkel DA Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In the beginning: the legal status of early embryos. Robertson JA Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):437-517. PubMed ID: 11659369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ghost mothers: human egg donation and the legacy of the past. Katz KD Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):733-80. PubMed ID: 11652863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Babies in limbo: law outpaced by fertility advances. Weiss R Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]