These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648067)
1. Joined for life, and living life to the full. Angier N N Y Times Web; 1997 Dec; ():F1, F5. PubMed ID: 11648067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The brief life of Angela Lakeberg. Toufexis A Time; 1994 Jun; 143(26):61-2. PubMed ID: 11645268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Joining in life and death: on separating the Lakeberg twins. Dougherty CJ Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 11653280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. One Siamese twin survives an extraordinary separation. Rosenthal E N Y Times Web; 1993 Aug; ():1, 7. PubMed ID: 11647942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Engineering perfect offspring: devaluing children and childhood. Fitzgerald WA Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):833-61. PubMed ID: 11657285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tragedies and medical choices. Lammers SE Christ Century; 1993 Sep 8-15; 110(25):845-6. PubMed ID: 11660055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Baby Jane Doe: the ethical issues. Conley JJ America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):84-9. PubMed ID: 11658402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn. Portela C Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Siamese twins, focus of ethical debate, are separated. Ob Gyn News; 1982 Oct 15-31; 17(20):7. PubMed ID: 11655561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The ultimate parental nightmare: should our 'bad baby' live or die? Lyon J Washington Post; 1985 Feb; ():C1, C2. PubMed ID: 11646289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Of diagnoses and discrimination: discriminatory nontreatment of infants with HIV infection. Crossley MA Columbia Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 93(7):1581-667. PubMed ID: 11659791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The legislative response to Infant Doe. Kuzma AL Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The ultimate choice. Toufexis A Time; 1993 Aug; 142(9):43-4. PubMed ID: 11645235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bioethical shock. White RJ America (NY); 1987 Feb; 156(8):174-6. PubMed ID: 11658837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Wrongdoing denied in care of 24 handicapped babies. Hall HB Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11646426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Intensive care of extremely premature newborns. Joseph R Singapore J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 20(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 11659322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of life, sanctity of creation: palliative or apotheosis? Smith GP Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):709-40. PubMed ID: 11652479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital allegedly let some newborns die. Kamen A Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts. Rhoden NK South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]