310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648129)
1. In tests on people, who watches the watchers?
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():F1, F4. PubMed ID: 11648129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethics lapses at Duke halt dozens of human experiments.
Hilts PJ; Stolberg SG
N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11648115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Duke's plan ends the ban on research.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. U.S. halts research on humans at Duke: university can't ensure safety, probers find.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11647726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. 'Unchecked' experiments on people raise concern.
Stolberg SG
N Y Times Web; 1997 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical ethics in the dock.
N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. V.A. hospital is told to halt all research.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1999 Mar; ():A25. PubMed ID: 11648101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. All is not well in research on human subjects.
Goldman J
N Y Times Web; 1986 Mar; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11647822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Limited guardianship: additional protection for mentally disabled research subjects used in biomedical and behavioral research.
Schaefer GF
Forum; 1981; 16(4):796-824. PubMed ID: 11651838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Obtaining "informed consent": controversy over radiation tests focuses attention on rules for human subjects.
Wheeler DL
Chron High Educ; 1994 Jan; 40():8-9, 16. PubMed ID: 11658067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
Katz J
IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part III).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11658036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Money is putting people at risk in biomedical research.
Andrews LB
Chron High Educ; 2000 Mar; 46(27):B1, B4-5. PubMed ID: 11657699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Government guinea pigs.
Rothman DJ
N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan; ():E21. PubMed ID: 11646304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Duke research resumes; policy debate widens.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11647725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies.
Prentice ED; Gordon B
IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy.
Moore DL
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects.
Owens JF
Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurobiological research involving human subjects: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks.
Puglisi JT; Ellis GB
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11654521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
