These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648150)

  • 21. International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc. [26 September 1989].
    United States. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():148. PubMed ID: 12344152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Can employers exclude women to protect children?
    Becker ME
    JAMA; 1990 Oct 24-31; 264(16):2113-7. PubMed ID: 2214080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Protecting workers from reproductive hazards.
    Levitsky M
    Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):488-97. PubMed ID: 11651101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. International Union v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 24 February 1988.
    United States. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():173. PubMed ID: 12289313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Armstrong v. Flowers Hospital, Inc.
    U.S. District Court, M.D. Alabama, S.D
    Fed Suppl; 1993 Feb; 812():1183-93. PubMed ID: 11648617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty.
    Johnsen D
    Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prenatal exposure to fetally toxic work environments: the dilemma of the 1978 Pregnancy Amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
    Furnish HA
    Iowa Law Rev; 1980 Oct; 66(1):63-129. PubMed ID: 11661992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The invisible woman: gender bias in medical research.
    Keville TD
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1994; 15():123-42. PubMed ID: 11660409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The evolution of the right to privacy after Roe v. Wade.
    Barnard D
    Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2 3):365-525. PubMed ID: 11659051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In utero in court.
    Moskowitz E
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(6):4. PubMed ID: 11643209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reproductive hazards in the workplace.
    Rawls RL
    Chem Eng News; 1980 Feb; 58(6):28-31. PubMed ID: 11663066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fetal rights: a new assault on feminism.
    Pollitt K
    Nation; 1990 Mar; 250(12):409-411, 414-416, 418. PubMed ID: 11656424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. California Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Guerra, 13 January 1987.
    United States. Supreme Court
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():97-8. PubMed ID: 12346800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Protecting us to death: women, pregnancy, and clinical research trials.
    Charo RA
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):135-87. PubMed ID: 11656322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Woman facing criminal charges over her conduct in pregnancy.
    Chambers M
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Oct; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11646500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stallman v. Youngquist.
    Illinois. Supreme Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Nov; 531():355-61. PubMed ID: 12041248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reasoning from the body: a historical perspective on abortion regulation and questions of equal protection.
    Siegel R
    Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 44(2):261-381. PubMed ID: 11656213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biological monitoring: the employer's dilemma.
    Miller FH
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):388-426. PubMed ID: 11644166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Okpalobi v. Foster.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Louisiana
    Fed Suppl; 1998 Jan; 981():977-88. PubMed ID: 11648638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Medicolegal implications of constitutional status for the unborn: "ambulatory chalices" or "priorities and aspirations.
    Tolton C
    Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1988; 47(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 11655976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.