309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648154)
1. In re Conroy.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Essex County
Atl Report; 1983 Feb; 457():1232-7. PubMed ID: 11648154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In the matter of George Clark.
Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 11644464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In the matter of Claire Conroy.
Connery JR
Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 11651840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Caring or starving? The case of Claire Conroy.
McCormick RA
America (NY); 1985 Apr; 152(13):269-73. PubMed ID: 11658669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In the Matter of Elizabeth Visbeck: an alleged incompetent.
Nimz MM
Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 11644463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Matter of Conroy.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1985 Jan; 486():1209-50. PubMed ID: 11648233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California?
Harber SM
Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity.
Agrawal A
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Quinlan: one step further.
Ek GK
Houst Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 24(2):383-98. PubMed ID: 11649893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Clark.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Camden County
Atl Report; 1986 Apr; 510():136-46. PubMed ID: 11648172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults.
Nelson LJ; Golenski JD
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In the matter of Mary Hier.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 11644048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
Murphy JG
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey.
Rust M
Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rasmussen v. Fleming.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 11644062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In re Peter.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():419-34. PubMed ID: 11648264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience.
Weinberg JK
Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
