242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648164)
1. Bartling v. Superior Court.
California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 5
Wests Calif Report; 1984 Dec; 209():220-7. PubMed ID: 11648164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bartling v. Glendale Adventist Medical Center.
California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 5
Wests Calif Report; 1986 Aug; 229():360-7. PubMed ID: 11648171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Life-and-death decisions.
Washington Post; 1985 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11646411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions.
Clementino BJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bouvia v. Superior Court (Glenchur).
California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2
Wests Calif Report; 1986 Apr; 225():297-308. PubMed ID: 11648237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment.
Dooling RP
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):895-918. PubMed ID: 11649881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Liability for improper maintenance of life support: balancing patient and physician autonomy.
Addlestone SI
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Oct; 46(5):1255-81. PubMed ID: 11653092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Shulman case and the right to refuse treatment.
Sneiderman B
Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11651301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The right to natural death.
Dickens BM
McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):847-79. PubMed ID: 11650592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond misguided paternalism: resuscitating the right to refuse medical treatment.
Malloy SE
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1998; 33():1035-91. PubMed ID: 11660805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Living wills in New York: are they valid?
Vile SE
Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
Tomlinson AK
Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The values history: a new standard of care.
Rich BA
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma.
Peterson GW
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 13(1):109-55. PubMed ID: 11658936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The issue of personal choice: the competent incurable patient and the right to commit suicide?
Morgan RC; Marks TC; Harty-Golder B
Miss Law Rev; 1992; 57(1):1-49. PubMed ID: 11651516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation.
Adams CR; Adams CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bouvia v. Superior Court: the death option.
Voboril LA
Pac Law J; 1987 Apr; 18(3):1029-53. PubMed ID: 11651883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The right to natural death.
Keyserlingk EW
Humane Med; 1985 Mar; 1(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 11649676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
