BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648221)

  • 1. McGann v. H & H Music Company.
    U.S. District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
    Fed Suppl; 1990 Jun; 742():392-4. PubMed ID: 11648221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. McGann v. H & H Music Company.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Nov; 946():401-8. PubMed ID: 11648220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Owens v. Storehouse, Inc.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
    Fed Report; 1993 Feb; 984():394-401. PubMed ID: 11648231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Owens v. Storehouse, Inc.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
    Fed Suppl; 1991 Jun; 773():416-20. PubMed ID: 11648218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Who is "us" and who is "them" -- common threads and the discriminatory cut-off of health care benefits for AIDS under ERISA and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
    Marcosson SA
    Am Univ Law Rev; 1994 Dec; 44(2):361-432. PubMed ID: 11654951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. AIDS and ERISA preemption: the double threat.
    Bruner JR
    Duke Law J; 1992 Apr; 41(5):1115-56. PubMed ID: 11654910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of the ADA on employer-provided insurance: limiting the potential financial burden of health care for AIDS victims.
    Woods KE
    Labor Lawyer; 1992; 8(2):271-87. PubMed ID: 11659505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. AIDS discrimination under federal, state, and local law after Arline.
    Wasson RP
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 15(2):221-78. PubMed ID: 11658972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implications of ERISA for health benefits and the number of self-funded ERISA plans.
    Copeland C; Pierron B
    EBRI Issue Brief; 1998 Jan; (193):1-26. PubMed ID: 10177290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AIDS, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and disability-based insurance distinctions.
    Turner R
    AIDS Public Policy J; 1993; 8(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 11654922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prevalent employer discriminatory behaviors toward employees with HIV and the likely impact of the ADA.
    Mello JA
    Labor Law J; 1994 Jun; 45(6):323-37. PubMed ID: 11659949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethical challenges of HIV infection in the workplace.
    Leonard AS
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1990; 5(1):53-73. PubMed ID: 11650438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Capping health insurance benefits for AIDS: an analysis of disability-based distinctions under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
    Eisenstat S
    J Law Polit; 1993; 10(1):1-49. PubMed ID: 11654924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AIDS and the law of Virginia.
    Labowitz KE
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1992; 3(1):67-112. PubMed ID: 11659881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AIDS--ADA--handicap discrimination--ERISA plan--preemption. McNeil v. Time Insurance Company, 205 F.3d 179 (5th Cir. 2000).
    Benefits Q; 2001; 17(3):66-7. PubMed ID: 11521553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What's wrong with the ERISA vacuum? Employers' freedom to limit health care coverage provided by risk retention plans.
    Gostin LO; Widiss AI
    JAMA; 1993 May; 269(19):2527-32. PubMed ID: 8487417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liability for managed care decisions: the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the uneven playing field.
    Mariner WK
    Am J Public Health; 1996 Jun; 86(6):863-9. PubMed ID: 8659664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health plan liability and ERISA: the expanding scope of state legislation.
    Hellinger FJ; Young GJ
    Am J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 95(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 15671453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mauro v. Borgess Medical Center.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D
    Fed Suppl; 1995 May; 886():1349-56. PubMed ID: 11648306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic testing in the workplace.
    Rowinski L
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():375-413. PubMed ID: 11645613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.