275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648226)
1. Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment).
Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
All Engl Law Rep; 1992 Jul; [1992]4():649-70. PubMed ID: 11648226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Court says doctors were right to treat Jehovah's Witness.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1992 Aug; 305(6848):272. PubMed ID: 11643026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Refusal of medical treatment on religious grounds: Re T (1992) 142 NLJ 1125 (CA) considered.
Bridge C
N Z Law J; 1992 Oct; ():341-4. PubMed ID: 11652735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
Rossiter GP
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The approach to the Jehovah's Witness patient.
Rothenberg DM
Anesthesiol Clin North Am; 1990 Sep; 8(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 11653928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Estate of Dorone.
Pennsylvania. Superior Court
Atl Report; 1985 Dec; 502():1271-81. PubMed ID: 11648262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mercy Hospital v. Jackson.
Maryland. Court of Appeals
Atl Report; 1986 Jun; 510():562-8. PubMed ID: 11648170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mercy Hospital v. Jackson.
Maryland. Court of Special Appeals
Atl Report; 1985 Apr; 489():1130-4. PubMed ID: 11648161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. University of Cincinnati Hospital v. Edmond.
Ohio. Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Apr; 506():299-302. PubMed ID: 12041244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Their life is in the blood: Jehovah's Witnesses, blood transfusions and the courts.
Moore ML
North KY Law Rev; 1983; 10(2):281-304. PubMed ID: 11649715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Who may refuse treatment?
Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Sep; (81):18-9. PubMed ID: 15997540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stamford Hospital v. Vega.
Connecticut. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1996 Apr; 674():821-34. PubMed ID: 11648307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion.
Watson SB
Clin Ethics Rep; 1991; 5(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 11653954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Compulsory medical treatment of adults.
Riga PJ
Cathol Lawyer; 1976; 22(2):105-37. PubMed ID: 11664685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Brown.
Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Fifth Division
North East Rep Second Ser; 1997 Dec; 689():397-406. PubMed ID: 12041238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Walker v. Region 2 Hospital Corp.
Canada. New Brunswick. Court of Appeal
Dom Law Rep; 1994 Apr; 116():477-98. PubMed ID: 12041078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Religious beliefs and life saving therapy.
O'Rourke K
Health Care Ethics USA; 1997; 5(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11654840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Compulsory medical treatment and religious freedom: whose law shall prevail?
Paris JJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 11661287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Jehovah's Witnesses, pregnancy, and blood transfusions: a paradigm for the autonomy rights of all pregnant women.
Levy JK
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):171-89. PubMed ID: 11657465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Re S (A Minor) (Medical Treatment).
Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
Family Law; 1992 Jul; [1993 Apr]23():215-6. PubMed ID: 11648256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
