These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648228)
1. Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Madigan. U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Fed Suppl; 1992 Jan; 781():797-806. PubMed ID: 11648228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beyond Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Quigg: the controversy over transgenic animal patents continues. Hecht EJ Am Univ Law Rev; 1992; 41(3):1023-74. PubMed ID: 11652629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The injustice of excluding laboratory rats, mice, and birds from the Animal Welfare Act. Orlans FB Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2000 Sep; 10(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 11658209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Animal advocates win court ruling. Labaton S N Y Times Web; 1993 Feb; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11646970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Animal advisors forced into the open. Kleiner K New Sci; 1997 Jan; 153(2066):9. PubMed ID: 11656576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing harm and justification in animal research: federal policy opens the laboratory door. Dresser R Rutgers Law Rev; 1988; 40(3):723-95. PubMed ID: 11650811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Court says lab rats deserve special care. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 2000 Oct; ():A16. PubMed ID: 12159836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Animal rights and wrongs. Stryker J Healthscan; 1984; 1(3):3-10. PubMed ID: 11658711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The legality of the Agriculture Department's exclusion of rats and mice from coverage under the Animal Welfare Act. Cohen H St Louis Univ Law J; 1987; 31(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 11650842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Access to animal care committees. Francione GL Rutgers Law Rev; 1990; 43(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11651138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The constitutional status of restrictions on experiments involving nonhuman animals: a comment on Professor Dresser's analysis. Francione GL Rutgers Law Rev; 1988; 40(3):797-818. PubMed ID: 11650812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Constitutional limits on the regulation of laboratory animal research. Garvin LT Yale Law J; 1988 Dec; 98(2):369-88. PubMed ID: 11650822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. International Primate Protection League v. Institute for Behavioral Research: the standing of animal protection organizations under the Animal Welfare Act. Holton AC J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():469-78. PubMed ID: 11645614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. USDA fines Pennsylvania animal laboratory. Sun M Science; 1985 Oct; 230(4724):423. PubMed ID: 11643824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulation of animal experimentation: United States of America. Orlans FB Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):138-52. PubMed ID: 11649993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Taub v. State. Maryland. Court of Appeals Atl Report; 1983 Aug; 463():819-22. PubMed ID: 11648158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. See no evil, hear no evil: the federal courts and the Silver Spring monkeys. Klauber B Univ Colo Law Rev; 1992; 63(2):501-20. PubMed ID: 11652222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. They asked for protection and they got policy: International Primate's mutilated monkeys. Messett M Akron Law Rev; 1987; 21(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 11649944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. House backs year's delay in extra care for lab rats. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 2000 Oct; ():A16. PubMed ID: 12159837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]