205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648233)
1. Matter of Conroy.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1985 Jan; 486():1209-50. PubMed ID: 11648233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Conroy.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division
Atl Report; 1983 Jul; 464():303-15. PubMed ID: 11648239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Peter.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():419-34. PubMed ID: 11648264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In re Conroy.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Essex County
Atl Report; 1983 Feb; 457():1232-7. PubMed ID: 11648154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Caring or starving? The case of Claire Conroy.
McCormick RA
America (NY); 1985 Apr; 152(13):269-73. PubMed ID: 11658669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity.
Agrawal A
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In the matter of Claire Conroy.
Connery JR
Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 11651840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In re Quinlan: one step further.
Ek GK
Houst Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 24(2):383-98. PubMed ID: 11649893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Estate of Longeway.
Illinois. Supreme Court
North East Rep Second Ser; 1989 Nov; 549():292-322. PubMed ID: 12041217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California?
Harber SM
Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
Jarrett C
Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rasmussen v. Fleming.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 11644062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonfeeding: lawful killing in CA, homicide in NJ.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Dec; 13(6):19-20. PubMed ID: 11644094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Clark.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Camden County
Atl Report; 1986 Apr; 510():136-46. PubMed ID: 11648172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The best interests of incompetent patients: the capacity for interpersonal relationships as a standard for decisionmaking.
Quinn KP
Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jul; 76(4):897-937. PubMed ID: 11650115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Visbeck.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Morris County
Atl Report; 1986 Feb; 510():125-33. PubMed ID: 11648551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience.
Weinberg JK
Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A "terrible beauty", the Irish Supreme Court, and dying.
Feenan D
Eur J Health Law; 1996 Mar; 3(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 11654847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey.
Rust M
Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
