These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648233)
61. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members. Healey JM Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Rasmussen v. Fleming. Pollard CT Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests. Watson DE Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Right to die upheld for comatose patients. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 11652365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims. Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. In re Fiori. Pennsylvania. Superior Court Atl Report; 1995 Jan; 652():1350-81. PubMed ID: 11648286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis. Krasik EB Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing. Koop CE; Grant ER Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I. Solnick PB Med Law; 1984 Sep; 3(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 11651779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. In re Requena. New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division Atl Report; 1986 Oct; 517():869-70. PubMed ID: 11648173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity. Mulholland KA Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):859-78. PubMed ID: 11652514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Does right to privacy include right to die? Court to decide. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11647412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Is there a right to die? Grad FP Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1976; 12(4):489-529. PubMed ID: 11663026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma. Peterson GW Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 13(1):109-55. PubMed ID: 11658936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital. Nimz MM Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 11644064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. In re Farrell. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():404-19. PubMed ID: 11648263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. The life support cases: myths and realities. Hartz JN Los Angel Lawyer; 1982; 5(5):18-20, 33, 52+. PubMed ID: 11653530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Maine's living will act and the termination of life-sustaining medical procedures. Herlan ER Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):83-148. PubMed ID: 11652533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. The case of Claire Conroy: will administrative review safeguard incompetent patients? Lo B; Dornbrand L Ann Intern Med; 1986 Jun; 104(6):869-73. PubMed ID: 3085567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri. Johnson SH St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]