These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648257)
1. South Glamorgan County Council v. W and B. Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division Family Law; 1992 Oct; [1993] Jul(23):398-9. PubMed ID: 11648257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re K, W and H (Minors) (Medical Treatment). Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division Fam Law Rep; 1992 Sep; 1993():854-9. PubMed ID: 12041092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re W (A Minor) (Medical Treatment). Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division All Engl Law Rep; 1992 Jul; [1992]4():627-49. PubMed ID: 11648298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment without consent: intervention by the court. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 May; 290(6479):1409-10. PubMed ID: 11658570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orr v. Knowles. Nebraska. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1983 Jul; 337():699-708. PubMed ID: 12041150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Refusal of treatment: competent child and parents -- Houston, Applicant. Grubb A Med Law Rev; 1997; 5(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 11655269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re R (A Minor) (Wardship: Consent to Treatment). Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal Wkly Law Rep; 1991 Jul; 1991 Oct 25():592-608. PubMed ID: 12041269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Limiting Gillick. Douglas G Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Feb; No. 75():34-5. PubMed ID: 11651271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "Who are you to say what my best interest is?" Minors' due process rights when admitted by parents for inpatient mental health treatment. Schmidt K Wash Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 71(4):1187-217. PubMed ID: 11660505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Zbaraz v. Hartigan. U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D Fed Suppl; 1991 Oct; 776():375-86. PubMed ID: 11648407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In re E.G. Illinois. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1989 Nov; 549():322-31. PubMed ID: 12041191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making. Parry J Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Branning. Illinois. Appellate Court, Fourth District North East Rep Second Ser; 1996 Dec; 674():463-72. PubMed ID: 12041226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Care and Protection of Beth. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Hampden North East Rep Second Ser; 1992 Mar; 587():1377-83. PubMed ID: 12041221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pentland v. Pentland. Canada. Ontario. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1978 Apr; 86():585-91. PubMed ID: 12041086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. American Academy of Pediatrics v. Lungren. California. Supreme Court Wests Pac Report; 1996 Apr; 912():1148-98. PubMed ID: 12041329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Keyholders and flak jackets: consent to medical treatment for children. Nicholls M Family Law; 1994 Feb; 24():81-5. PubMed ID: 11660606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Re B (A Minor) (Treatment and Secure Accommodation). Grubb A Med Law Rev; 1997; 5(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 11655268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Making kids take their medicine: the privacy and due process rights of de facto competent minors. Costello JC Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 31(3):907-27. PubMed ID: 11660787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]