192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648262)
1. In re Estate of Dorone.
Pennsylvania. Superior Court
Atl Report; 1985 Dec; 502():1271-81. PubMed ID: 11648262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Estate of Dorone.
Pennsylvania. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1987 Dec; 534():452-6. PubMed ID: 11648190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Estate of Darrell Dorone.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):511-3. PubMed ID: 11644375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Cabrera.
Pennsylvania. Superior Court
Atl Report; 1989 Jan; 552():1114-21. PubMed ID: 11648182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mercy Hospital v. Jackson.
Maryland. Court of Appeals
Atl Report; 1986 Jun; 510():562-8. PubMed ID: 11648170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Their life is in the blood: Jehovah's Witnesses, blood transfusions and the courts.
Moore ML
North KY Law Rev; 1983; 10(2):281-304. PubMed ID: 11649715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical priority of patients' wishes.
Dickens BM
Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Malette v. Shulman.
Canada. Ontario. Supreme Court, Court of Appeal
Dom Law Rep; 1990 Mar; 67():321-39. PubMed ID: 12041075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In re E.G.
Illinois. Supreme Court
North East Rep Second Ser; 1989 Nov; 549():322-31. PubMed ID: 12041191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stamford Hospital v. Vega.
Connecticut. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1996 Apr; 674():821-34. PubMed ID: 11648307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion.
Watson SB
Clin Ethics Rep; 1991; 5(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 11653954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Shulman case and the right to refuse treatment.
Sneiderman B
Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11651301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Brown.
Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Fifth Division
North East Rep Second Ser; 1997 Dec; 689():397-406. PubMed ID: 12041238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Duran.
Pennsylvania. Superior Court
Wests Atl Report; 2001; 769():497-508. PubMed ID: 16477735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Re McTavish and Director, Child Welfare Act.
Canada. Alberta. Court of Queen's Bench
Dom Law Rep; 1986 Oct; 32():394-411. PubMed ID: 12041069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "In God we trust": when parents refuse medical treatment for their children based upon their sincere religious beliefs.
Plastine LM
Const Law J; 1993; 3(1):123-60. PubMed ID: 12083094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The conflict between child's medical needs and parents' religious beliefs.
Probst JE
Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(2):175-92. PubMed ID: 11652023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Dubreuil: is an individual's right to refuse a blood transfusion contingent on parental status?
Bamonte JL; Bierman C
Nova Law Rev; 1992; 17(1):517-47. PubMed ID: 11659589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. When minors refuse medical treatment.
Teicher SA
Christ Sci Monitor; 1999 Feb; ():3. PubMed ID: 11647638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment).
Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
All Engl Law Rep; 1992 Jul; [1992]4():649-70. PubMed ID: 11648226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
