219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648266)
1. In re Gardner.
Maine. Supreme Judicial Court
Atl Report; 1987 Dec; 534():947-59. PubMed ID: 11648266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Gardner.
Thompson LC
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 11644474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Top Maine court backs right to die.
N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():41. PubMed ID: 11646647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Jobes.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():434-65. PubMed ID: 11648265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Estate of Prange.
Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Fourth Division
North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Feb; 520():946-54. PubMed ID: 12041256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Right-to-die case gets first hearing in Supreme Court.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Dec; ():A1, B26. PubMed ID: 11646739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Estate of Longeway.
Illinois. Supreme Court
North East Rep Second Ser; 1989 Nov; 549():292-322. PubMed ID: 12041217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged.
United States Catholic Conference
Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Conservatorship of Torres.
Minnesota. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1984 Nov; 357():332-41. PubMed ID: 12041145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Family matters: is big brother your next-of-kin?
Lomasky LE
Reason; 1990 Nov; 22(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 11652569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die.
Ellman IM
Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
Watson DE
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Drabick.
California. Court of Appeal, Sixth District
Wests Calif Report; 1988 Apr; 245():840-61. PubMed ID: 11648267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
Jarrett C
Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, Inc.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Norfolk
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Sep; 497():626-46. PubMed ID: 12041216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In re Fiori.
Pennsylvania. Superior Court
Atl Report; 1995 Jan; 652():1350-81. PubMed ID: 11648286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
