These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648273)

  • 1. Weaver v. Reagen.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1989 Sep; 886():194-200. PubMed ID: 11648273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weaver v. Reagen.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Missouri, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1988 Sep; 701():717-26. PubMed ID: 11648271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical necessity, AIDS, and the law.
    Schultz GP; Pormenter CA
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1990; 9(2):379-420. PubMed ID: 11651112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproductive Health Services v. Freeman.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1980 Jan; 614():585-601. PubMed ID: 11648325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hope v. Perales.
    New York. Court of Appeals
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1994 May; 634():183-8. PubMed ID: 12041237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Roe v. Norton. 31 Dec 1975.
    U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
    Fed Suppl; 1975; 408():660-5. PubMed ID: 11645998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rationing medical resources: a constitutional, legal, and policy analysis.
    Blumstein JF
    Tex Law Rev; 1981 Nov; 59(8):1345-400. PubMed ID: 11650622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coe v. Melahn.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1992 Mar; 958():223-6. PubMed ID: 11648406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High court urged to reject Colorado appeal of finding that it must fund rape and incest survivors' abortions.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Nov; 4(20):2. PubMed ID: 12320281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1989 Jul; 109():3040-85. PubMed ID: 12041289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Department of Health and Human Services.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1983 Dec; 723():1114-20. PubMed ID: 11648344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hope Medical Group for Women v. Edwards.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1998 Sep; 63():418-29. PubMed ID: 11648424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. State of Georgia, Dept. of Medical Assistance v. Heckler.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
    Fed Suppl; 1984 Apr; 583():1377-82. PubMed ID: 11648336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion on demand in a post-Wade context: must the state pay the bills?
    Fordham Law Rev; 1973; 41(4):921-44. PubMed ID: 11661025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Dalton; Orr v. Nelson.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1995 Jul; 60():497-505. PubMed ID: 11648415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doe v. Maher.
    Connecticut. Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven
    Atl Report; 1986 Apr; 515():134-62. PubMed ID: 11648371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coe v. Hooker. 8 Jan 1976.
    U.S. District Court, D. New Hampshire
    Fed Suppl; 1976; 406():1072-86. PubMed ID: 11645978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orr v. Nelson.
    U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska
    Fed Suppl; 1994 Nov; 902():1019-22. PubMed ID: 11648423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, en banc
    Fed Report; 1996 Mar; 79():790-859. PubMed ID: 11648417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.