These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648286)

  • 21. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience.
    Weinberg JK
    Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged.
    United States Catholic Conference
    Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In re Gardner.
    Maine. Supreme Judicial Court
    Atl Report; 1987 Dec; 534():947-59. PubMed ID: 11648266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims.
    Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH
    Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients.
    Robertson JA
    Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
    Eisenberg KG
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Constituting family and death through the struggle with state power: Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
    Ronzetti TA
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1991 Sep; 46(1):149-204. PubMed ID: 11652668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Wishes of patient in refusing care backed in Jersey.
    Sullivan JF
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11647828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment: what are the legal limits in an aging society?
    Rothenberg KH
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1989; 33(3):575-602. PubMed ID: 11650402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In re Drabick.
    California. Court of Appeal, Sixth District
    Wests Calif Report; 1988 Apr; 245():840-61. PubMed ID: 11648267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Gray v. Romeo.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 11644379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
    Buchanan AE
    UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Afterward: the case of Daniel Joseph Fiori.
    Moore DL
    Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):811-8. PubMed ID: 11652866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live".
    Kamisar Y
    Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New York's highest court rejects family's plea in right-to-die case.
    Shipp ER
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Oct; ():1, 36. PubMed ID: 11646705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation.
    Adams CR; Adams CT
    Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Government as arbiter, not custodian: relational privacy as foundation for a right to refuse medical treatment prolonging incompetents' lives.
    Cox SE
    N M Law Rev; 1988; 18(1):131-52. PubMed ID: 11652538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, Inc.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Norfolk
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Sep; 497():626-46. PubMed ID: 12041216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. From medicalization to legalization to politicization: O'Connor, Cruzan, and refusal of treatment in the 1990s.
    Johnson SH
    Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):685-722. PubMed ID: 11650431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
    Colabrese CA
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.