These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648297)

  • 1. Foundation on Economic Trends v. Weinberger.
    U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
    Fed Suppl; 1985 May; 610():829-44. PubMed ID: 11648297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
    Fed Report; 1985 Feb; 756():143-61. PubMed ID: 11648295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Court hears suit on biowarfare laboratory.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1985 May; 228(4701):827-8. PubMed ID: 11643758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Foundation on Economic Trends v. Bowen.
    U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
    Fed Suppl; 1989 Oct; 722():787-92. PubMed ID: 11648296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Judge blocks biological warfare laboratory.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1985 Jun; 228(4706):1411. PubMed ID: 11643779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rifkin vs. Defense Department.
    Sci News; 1984 Dec 22-29; 126(25-26):397. PubMed ID: 11653595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Court blocks Army testing laboratory.
    Miller JA
    Sci News; 1985 Jun; 127(23):359. PubMed ID: 11653638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Army agrees to new study of biowarfare laboratory.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1985 Feb; 227(4687):614. PubMed ID: 11643708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research on biological warfare is challenged.
    Cushman JH
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Sep; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biological defense defended.
    Norman C
    Science; 1988 May; 240(4855):981. PubMed ID: 11644306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biotech firms win approval for more open-air tests.
    Joyce C
    New Sci; 1984 Jun; 102(1413):4. PubMed ID: 11655646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regulating the environmental release of genetically engineered organisms: Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler.
    Pendorf S
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1985; 12(4):891-921. PubMed ID: 11653640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Doe v. Sullivan.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Jul; 938():1370-86. PubMed ID: 11648219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gene cloning 'could further biological warfare.
    Joyce C
    New Sci; 1984 Feb; 101(1397):7. PubMed ID: 11655577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recombinant DNA and technology assessment.
    Georgetown Law J; 1977; 11(4):785-878. PubMed ID: 11664859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic experiment by military approved.
    Cohn V; Hilts PJ
    Washington Post; 1984 Feb; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 11646347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proposal for a coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology.
    U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy
    Fed Regist; 1984 Dec; 49(252):50856-907. PubMed ID: 11655658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biotech's stalled revolution.
    Schneider K
    N Y Times Mag; 1986 Nov; ():42-44, 47-48+. PubMed ID: 11649783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A case analysis of NEPA implementation: NIH and DNA recombinant research.
    Chalker SM; Catz RS
    Duke Law J; 1978 Mar; 1978(1):57-112. PubMed ID: 11661621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recombinant DNA research; actions under guidelines; notice.
    U.S. National Institutes of Health
    Fed Regist; 1984 Sep; 49(179):36052-60. PubMed ID: 11655750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.