148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648308)
1. In re Tavel.
Delaware. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1995 Aug; 661():1061-72. PubMed ID: 11648308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Incompetent patient (PVS): decision-making, courts and the family -- In re Tavel.
Grubb A
Med Law Rev; 1997; 5(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 11655270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In re Fiori.
Pennsylvania. Supreme Court, E.D.
Atl Report; 1996 Apr; 673():905-14. PubMed ID: 11648305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Gordy.
Delaware. Court of Chancery, New Castle County
Atl Report; 1994 Dec; 658():613-9. PubMed ID: 11648291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The evanescence of living wills.
Francis LP
Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Estate of Prange.
Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Fourth Division
North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Feb; 520():946-54. PubMed ID: 12041256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Edna M.F.
Wisconsin. Supreme Court
North West Rep Second Ser; 1997 Jun; 563():485-501. PubMed ID: 12041175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Jobes.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():434-65. PubMed ID: 11648265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Death in the legislature: inventing legal tools for autonomy.
Sabatino CP
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):309-39. PubMed ID: 11652237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Advance directives and the pursuit of death with dignity: New Jersey's new legislation.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1992; 44(2):335-403. PubMed ID: 11651452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. DeGrella v. Elston: Kentucky Supreme Court rules on an incompetent's right to die.
Mehrle JP
North KY Law Rev; 1994; 21(2):449-74. PubMed ID: 11653010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, Inc.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Norfolk
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Sep; 497():626-46. PubMed ID: 12041216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advance directives for health care: a proposal for priests and religious.
Caspar R
Rev Relig; 1988; 47(2):202-16. PubMed ID: 11652515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
