148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648308)
21. In re Fiori.
Pennsylvania. Superior Court
Atl Report; 1995 Jan; 652():1350-81. PubMed ID: 11648286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
Nimz MM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 11644064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I.
Hodgman DR; Frazer QR
Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. In re Guardianship of L.W.
Wisconsin. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1992 Apr; 482():60-79. PubMed ID: 12041147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation.
Adams CR; Adams CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The right to death.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. In re Peter.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():419-34. PubMed ID: 11648264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients.
Robertson JA
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Louisiana's Natural Death Act and dilemmas in medical ethics.
Vitiello M
LA Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):259-309. PubMed ID: 11649843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
Watson DE
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Indiana's new health care consent act: a guiding light for the health care provider.
Thompson WH
Indiana Law Rev; 1988; 21(1):181-203. PubMed ID: 11659030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Living wills: the need for uniform state laws.
Warnock HC
Probate Prop; 1991; 5(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 11652620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. In re Lawrance.
Indiana. Supreme Court
North East Rep Second Ser; 1991 Sep; 579():32-48. PubMed ID: 12041219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Physician willingness to withhold tube feeding after Cruzan: an empirical study.
Peters PG; Ely JW; Zweig SC; Elder NC; Schneider FD
Miss Law Rev; 1992; 57():831-48. PubMed ID: 11654076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Family matters: is big brother your next-of-kin?
Lomasky LE
Reason; 1990 Nov; 22(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 11652569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises-Connecticut.
Connecticut. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1989 Jan; 553():596-609. PubMed ID: 11648272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Appointing an agent to make medical treatment choices.
Fowler M
Columbia Law Rev; 1984 May; 84(4):985-1031. PubMed ID: 11649964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. In the Matter of Elizabeth Visbeck: an alleged incompetent.
Nimz MM
Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 11644463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. In re Martin.
Michigan. Court of Appeals
Wests North West Rep; 1993 Jul; 504():917-28. PubMed ID: 12041148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In re Westchester County Medical Center (O'Connor).
New York. Court of Appeals
North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Oct; 531():607-27. PubMed ID: 12041190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
