These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648309)
1. Mayfield v. Dalton. U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Fed Report; 1997 Mar; 109():1423-7. PubMed ID: 11648309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mayfield v. Dalton. U.S. District Court, D. Hawaii Fed Suppl; 1995 Sep; 901():300-6. PubMed ID: 11648311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two marines who refused to comply with genetic-testing order face a court-martial. Lewis NA N Y Times Web; 1996 Apr; ():7. PubMed ID: 11647101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandatory genetic dogtags and the Fourth Amendment: the need for a new post-Skinner test. Scherer RC Georgetown Law J; 1997 Jun; 85(6):2007-38. PubMed ID: 16523576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The privacy implications of Professor Anderson's proposed mandatory registry for bone marrow donation: a reply. Hartman RG Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):531-51. PubMed ID: 11656304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sanders v. Coman. U.S. District Court, E.D. North Carolina, W.D. Fed Suppl; 1994 Oct; 864():496-502. PubMed ID: 11648290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Department of Defense DNA registry raises legal, ethical issues. Mnookin S Genewatch; 1996 Aug; 10(1):1, 3, 11. PubMed ID: 11656662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Local 1812, American Federation of Government Employees v. U.S. Department of State. U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Fed Suppl; 1987 Apr; 662():50-5. PubMed ID: 11648179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Jones v. Murray. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Apr; 962():302-15. PubMed ID: 11648258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Encouraging bone marrow transplants from unrelated donors: some proposed solutions to a pressing problem. Anderson MF Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):477-530. PubMed ID: 11656303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New Zealand court allows national blood samples to be used in civil trial. Coney S Lancet; 1999 Aug; 354(9180):753. PubMed ID: 11660684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic privacy: constitutional considerations in forensic DNA testing. Burk DL; Hess JA Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1994; 5(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11657430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. State v. Olivas. Washington. Supreme Court Pac Rep Second Ser; 1993 Aug; 856():1076-94. PubMed ID: 12041122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1983 Dec; 723():1114-20. PubMed ID: 11648344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Plowman v. U.S. Department of the Army. U.S. District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division Fed Suppl; 1988 Oct; 698():627-39. PubMed ID: 11648181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Privacy concerns regarding government use of genetic information. Dash JF J Biolaw Bus; 1999; 2(4):46-54. PubMed ID: 11658225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners. Love SH Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. State of Georgia v. Heckler. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Fed Report; 1985 Aug; 768():1293-9. PubMed ID: 11648354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1); proposed rule. U.S. Department of Defense. Office of the Secretary Fed Regist; 1989 Dec; 54(232):50243-51. PubMed ID: 11655952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A "society apart?" The military's response to the threat of AIDS. McLaughlin EB Army Lawyer; 1993 Oct; ():3-16. PubMed ID: 11652769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]