These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648314)

  • 1. Safer v. Estate of Pack.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division
    Atl Report; 1996 Jul; 677():1188-93. PubMed ID: 11648314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The argument against a physician's duty to warn for genetic diseases: the conflicts created by Safer v. Estate of Pack.
    Liang A
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(2):437-53. PubMed ID: 16281336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pate v. Threlkel.
    Florida. District Court of Appeal, First District
    Wests South Report; 1994 Aug; 640():183-6. PubMed ID: 12041296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pate v. Threlkel.
    Florida. Supreme Court
    Wests South Report; 1995 Jul; 661():278-82. PubMed ID: 12041297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A physician's duty to warn a patient's relatives of a patient's genetically inheritable disease.
    Burnett JW
    Houst Law Rev; 1999; 36(2):559-82. PubMed ID: 12666680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Schroeder v. Perkel.
    New Jersey. Supreme Court
    Atl Report; 1981 Jul; 432():834-46. PubMed ID: 11648521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estate of Behringer v. Medical Center at Princeton.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Law Division, Mercer County
    Atl Report; 1991 Apr; 592():1251-84. PubMed ID: 11648592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic torts: the law of the future -- the duty of physicians to disclose the presence of a genetic disease to the relatives of their patients with the disease.
    Deftos LJ
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1997; 32(1):105-37. PubMed ID: 11660530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estate of Urbaniak v. Newton.
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1
    Wests Calif Report; 1991 Jan; 277():354-63. PubMed ID: 11648594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New Jersey Superior Court broadens physician's duty to warn.
    Dempsey KJ
    J Law Med Ethics; 1996; 24(4):391. PubMed ID: 9180530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic risk: the new frontier for the duty to warn.
    Petrila J
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(3):405-21. PubMed ID: 11443700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tort law--the psychiatric duty to warn: Cairl v. State, 323 N.W. 2d 20 (Minn. 1982).
    DeLaittre C
    Hamline Law Rev; 1983 Jul; 6(2):513-34. PubMed ID: 11658557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance of invasive procedures by HIV-infected doctors: the duty to disclose under the informed consent doctrine.
    DeBarge MW
    Conn Law Rev; 1993; 25(3):991-1025. PubMed ID: 11659692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Loophole in physician "confidentiality" statute permits New Jersey Supreme Court to allow unauthorized disclosure for socially compelling reason: State of New Jersey v. Linda A. Schreiber.
    McIntyre RL; Toreki W; Murphy PA; Abramson M; Hammond J
    Info Trends; 1991; 6(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 11651278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doe v. Roe.
    Wisconsin. Court of Appeals
    Wests North West Rep; 1989 Jun; 444():437-43. PubMed ID: 12041133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Torts and the double helix: malpractice liability for failure to warn of genetic risks.
    Andrews LB
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):149-84. PubMed ID: 11656665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Duty to warn of genetic harm in breach of patient confidentiality.
    Keeling SL
    J Law Med; 2004 Nov; 12(2):235-53. PubMed ID: 15575325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kerins v. Hartley.
    California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2
    Wests Calif Report; 1993 Jul; 21():621-33. PubMed ID: 11648612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The therapist's duty to protect third parties: a guide for the perplexed.
    George JE; Korin JB; Quattrone MS; Mandel JJ
    Rutgers Law J; 1983; 14(3):637-51. PubMed ID: 11658758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doe v. Noe.
    Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Sixth Division
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1997 Dec; 690():1012-23. PubMed ID: 12041225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.