These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648330)

  • 1. Erzinger v. Regents of University of California.
    California. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 1
    Wests Calif Report; 1982 Sep; 185():791-4. PubMed ID: 11648330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. First Amendment challenges to the use of mandatory student fees to help fund student abortions.
    Antonini TJ
    J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 11655933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discretionary power: challenges to the use of student fees for abortion services.
    Gibbs A
    NACUBO Bus Off; 1991 Jan; 24(7):36-9. PubMed ID: 12343977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. State.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1980 Jan; 612():359-63. PubMed ID: 11648350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planned Parenthood of Central and Northern Arizona v. State.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 718():938-51. PubMed ID: 11648333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New York v. Sullivan.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Fed Report; 1989 Nov; 889():401-18. PubMed ID: 11648392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. West Virginia Association of Community Health Centers v. Sullivan.
    U.S. District Court, S.D. West Virginia, at Charleston
    Fed Suppl; 1990 Mar; 737():929-57. PubMed ID: 11648394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hodgson v. Minnesota.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2926-72. PubMed ID: 12041294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproductive Health Services v. Freeman.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1980 Jan; 614():585-601. PubMed ID: 11648325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The selective funding problem: abortions and religious schools.
    McConnell MW
    Harv Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 104(5):989-1050. PubMed ID: 11656068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rust v. Sullivan: triumph of the right over reason.
    Call EC
    J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Winter; 31(1):123-42. PubMed ID: 11656449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Planned Parenthood Federation of America v. Bowen, 25 February 1988.
    United States. District Court, District of Colorado
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():44. PubMed ID: 12289568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: abortion funding restrictions as an unconstitutional condition.
    Sherman CW
    Calif Law Rev; 1982 Jul; 70(4):978-1013. PubMed ID: 11655731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Birth Control Centers, Inc. v. Reizen.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1984 Aug; 743():352-69. PubMed ID: 11648349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abortion--State Budget Act restricting circumstances under which public funds would be authorized to pay for abortions for Medi-Cal recipients held unconstitutional--Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers, 29 Cal. 3d 252, 625 P. 2d 779, 172 Cal. Rptr. 866 (1981).
    Harris DJ
    J Fam Law; 1981-1982; 20(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 11655656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graham v. Deukmejian.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1983 Aug; 713():518-20. PubMed ID: 11648160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. State of Georgia v. Heckler.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
    Fed Report; 1985 Aug; 768():1293-9. PubMed ID: 11648354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women's Health Services v. Maher.
    U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
    Fed Suppl; 1981 May; 514():265-76. PubMed ID: 11648347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Hyde Amendment and Medicaid abortions.
    Gunty S
    Forum; 1981; 16(4):825-40. PubMed ID: 11651839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doe v. Maher.
    Connecticut. Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven
    Atl Report; 1986 Apr; 515():134-62. PubMed ID: 11648371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.