These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648332)
1. Baird v. Department of Public Health. U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Fed Report; 1979 Jun; 599():1098-103. PubMed ID: 11648332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. People v. Frey. Illinois. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1973 Mar; 294():257-9. PubMed ID: 12041231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sojourner T v. Edwards. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Sep; 974():27-32. PubMed ID: 11648404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking. Nivala J Const Law J; 1993; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system. Kindregan CP Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1989 Jul; 109():3040-85. PubMed ID: 12041289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ragsdale v. Turnock. U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Fed Report; 1988 Apr; 841():1358-408. PubMed ID: 11648382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster. U.S. District Court, W.D. Missouri, C.D. Fed Suppl; 1987 Apr; 662():407-30. PubMed ID: 11648378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Justice Holmes and Roe v. Wade. Novick SM Trial; 1989 Dec; 25(12):58-64. PubMed ID: 11656018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal abortion under fierce attack 15 years after Roe v. Wade ruling. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1988 May; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. High court's ruling enshrines abortion as fundamental right. Barbash F Washington Post; 1983 Jun; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade. Bezanson RP Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1993 May; 822():227-39. PubMed ID: 11648410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. American College of Obstetricians v. Thornburgh. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1984 May; 737():283-319. PubMed ID: 11648491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote. Taylor S N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Guam Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Ada. U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Jun; 962():1366-74. PubMed ID: 11648405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron. Coleman JJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation. Destro RA Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]