These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648338)

  • 21. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reproductive Health Services v. Freeman.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1980 Jan; 614():585-601. PubMed ID: 11648325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
    Butler PA
    Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The racially disparate impact of restrictions on the public funding of abortion: an analysis of current equal protection doctrine.
    Baron DR
    Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1993; 13(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11656354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Abortion--State Budget Act restricting circumstances under which public funds would be authorized to pay for abortions for Medi-Cal recipients held unconstitutional--Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers, 29 Cal. 3d 252, 625 P. 2d 779, 172 Cal. Rptr. 866 (1981).
    Harris DJ
    J Fam Law; 1981-1982; 20(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 11655656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection.
    Wilcox JK
    Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Women's Health Services v. Maher.
    U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
    Fed Suppl; 1981 May; 514():265-76. PubMed ID: 11648347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. State constitutions as a source of individual liberties: expanding protection for abortion funding under Medicaid.
    Vuernick R
    J Contemp Law; 1993; 19(1):185-216. PubMed ID: 11652310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fischer v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, 31 May 1988.
    United States. Pennsylvania. Commonwealth Court
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():51. PubMed ID: 12289589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
    Hendrickson E
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hope v. Perales: expanding medically necessary abortion rights of pregnant indigent women under New York and Nebraska state constitutional due process clauses.
    Brown M
    Neb Law Rev; 1993; 72(2):586-607. PubMed ID: 11656347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Abortion and the indigent.
    Altman A
    J Soc Philos; 1980 Jan; 11(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 11655611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Utah Women's Clinic, Inc. v. Graham.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1995 Jun; 892():1379-85. PubMed ID: 11648421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. D.R. v. Mitchell.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1980 Mar; 617():203-6. PubMed ID: 11648328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Barnett BA
    Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
    Finn J
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Right to Choose v. Byrne.
    New Jersey. Supreme Court
    Atl Report; 1982 Aug; 450():925-51. PubMed ID: 11648363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Funding of medically-necessary abortions: a reexamination of U.S. law and a call for EC federalism.
    Nishi J
    Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1992; [1992]():517-38. PubMed ID: 11652961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sojourner T v. Edwards.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1992 Sep; 974():27-32. PubMed ID: 11648404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Department of Health and Human Services.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1983 Dec; 723():1114-20. PubMed ID: 11648344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.