These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648342)
1. Schulte v. Douglas. U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska Fed Suppl; 1981 Jul; 567():522-9. PubMed ID: 11648342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Charles v. Daley. U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Fed Report; 1984 Nov; 749():452-64. PubMed ID: 11648339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carhart v. Stenberg. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1999 Sep; 192():1142-52. PubMed ID: 11648438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe. Sendor BB Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Floyd v. Anders. 4 Nov 1977. U.S. District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division Fed Suppl; 1977; 440():535-40. PubMed ID: 11646007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence. Buckley M NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Eubanks v. Stengel. U.S. District Court, W.D. Kentucky Fed Suppl; 1998 Nov; 28():1024-43. PubMed ID: 11648437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right? Barber RA Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study. Olmstead FH Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth. 31 Jan 1975. U.S. District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D Fed Suppl; 1975; 392():1362-79. PubMed ID: 11646047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Womens Services v. Thone. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1982 Oct; 690():667-9. PubMed ID: 11648362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus. Wood MA; Hawkins LB Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Margaret S. v. Edwards. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Fed Report; 1986 Jul; 794():994-1004. PubMed ID: 11648552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. People v. Frey. Illinois. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1973 Mar; 294():257-9. PubMed ID: 12041231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. American College of Obstetricians v. Thornburgh. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1984 May; 737():283-319. PubMed ID: 11648491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Towards a practical implementation of the abortion decision: the interests of the physician, the woman and the fetus. Sebek M De Paul Law Rev; 1976; 25(3):676-706. PubMed ID: 11664630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1988 Jun; 686():1089-138. PubMed ID: 11648582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Fed Report; 1995 Aug; 61():1493-505. PubMed ID: 11648625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]