These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648342)
41. Criminal abortion revisited. Buell SW N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 66(6):1774-831. PubMed ID: 11652642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The abortion cases. Rust ME ABA J; 1986 Feb; 72():50-3. PubMed ID: 11655726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Women of the State of Minnesota v. Gomez. Minnesota. Supreme Court North West Rep Second Ser; 1995 Dec; 542():17-42. PubMed ID: 12041173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life. Parness JA; Pritchard SK Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Abortion and the right of privacy. Ortega ML Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. An analysis of the 1974 Massachusetts Abortion Statute and a minor's right to abortion. Malfa KA New Engl Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):417-54. PubMed ID: 11664438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Jegley. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eight Circuit Fed Report; 1999 Sep; 192():794-8. PubMed ID: 11648439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The legal status of the unborn after Webster. Parness JA Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster. U.S. District Court, W.D. Missouri, C.D. Fed Suppl; 1987 Apr; 662():407-30. PubMed ID: 11648378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. State. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1990 Aug; 910():479-88. PubMed ID: 11648398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City v. Ashcroft. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1981 Jul; 655():848-78. PubMed ID: 11648459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Abortion: a constitutional problem in European perspective. Forder CJ Maastrich J Eur Comp Law; 1994; 1():56-100. PubMed ID: 11656792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote. Taylor S N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin v. Doyle. U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin Fed Suppl; 1998 Jun; 9():1033-46. PubMed ID: 11648428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Fed Report; 1996 Dec; 102():1112-8. PubMed ID: 11648427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1988 Jul; 851():1071-85. PubMed ID: 11648383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system. Kindregan CP Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Commonwealth v. Edelin. 17 Dec 1976. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk North East Rep Second Ser; 1976; 359():4-29. PubMed ID: 12038352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]