278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648347)
1. Women's Health Services v. Maher.
U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
Fed Suppl; 1981 May; 514():265-76. PubMed ID: 11648347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Doe v. Maher.
Connecticut. Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven
Atl Report; 1986 Apr; 515():134-62. PubMed ID: 11648371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Barnett BA
Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The racially disparate impact of restrictions on the public funding of abortion: an analysis of current equal protection doctrine.
Baron DR
Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1993; 13(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11656354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Doe v. Mathews.
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
Fed Suppl; 1976 Oct; 422():141-7. PubMed ID: 11648360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Amendment No. 336.
Bartlett DF
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
Corns CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hope Medical Group for Women v. Edwards.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Fed Report; 1998 Sep; 63():418-29. PubMed ID: 11648424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Harris v. McRae: the Hyde Amendment stands while rights of poor women fall.
Sewell CC; Wetterer MA
KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(2):359-91. PubMed ID: 11655486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. State of Georgia, Dept. of Medical Assistance v. Heckler.
U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Fed Suppl; 1984 Apr; 583():1377-82. PubMed ID: 11648336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Constitutional law--health law--constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment--medically necessary abortions need not be funded by the state or federal government under Medicaid--Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).
Brath MS
Whittier Law Rev; 1981; 3(3):381-408. PubMed ID: 11655629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection.
Wilcox JK
Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Gray AD
Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Poor women get word on health from Court.
Mann J
Washington Post; 1980 Jul; ():B1, B3. PubMed ID: 11647332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
Erca A
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
Butler PA
Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion on demand in a post-Wade context: must the state pay the bills?
Fordham Law Rev; 1973; 41(4):921-44. PubMed ID: 11661025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Orr v. Nelson.
U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska
Fed Suppl; 1994 Nov; 902():1019-22. PubMed ID: 11648423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Harris v. McRae: the Court retreats from Roe v. Wade.
Brock VM
Loyola Law Rev; 1980; 26(3):749-60. PubMed ID: 11664179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
