278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648347)
21. Abortion and the indigent.
Altman A
J Soc Philos; 1980 Jan; 11(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 11655611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Dalton.
U.S. District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Little Rock Division
Fed Suppl; 1994 Jul; 860():609-31. PubMed ID: 11648416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Harris v. McRae. 30 Jun 1980.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1980; 448():297-357. PubMed ID: 12038373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. State of Georgia v. Heckler.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Fed Report; 1985 Aug; 768():1293-9. PubMed ID: 11648354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hern v. Beye.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Fed Report; 1995 Jun; 57():906-13. PubMed ID: 11648418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Abortion funding and wise social policy: implications of Harris v. McRae.
Gold RB
Women Health; 1980; 5(4):79-83. PubMed ID: 11655640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Reproductive Health Services v. Freeman.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Fed Report; 1980 Jan; 614():585-601. PubMed ID: 11648325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Utah Women's Clinic, Inc. v. Graham.
U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
Fed Suppl; 1995 Jun; 892():1379-85. PubMed ID: 11648421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of recent Medicaid decisions on a constitutional right: abortions only for the rich?
Lalli MA
Fordham Urban Law J; 1978; 6(3):687-710. PubMed ID: 11663905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment.
Skahn SL
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. New York v. Sullivan.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Fed Report; 1989 Nov; 889():401-18. PubMed ID: 11648392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Illinois v. United States Department of Health and Human Services.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Fed Report; 1985 Aug; 772():329-35. PubMed ID: 11648364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.
Pennsylvania. Commonwealth Court
Atl Report; 1984 Sep; 482():1148-62. PubMed ID: 11648341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
Linton PB
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The unborn and the born again.
New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Dalton; Orr v. Nelson.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Fed Report; 1995 Jul; 60():497-505. PubMed ID: 11648415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In spite of ban, U.S. funds 1,000 abortions a week.
Rich S; Dugger CW
Washington Post; 1980 Aug; ():A11. PubMed ID: 11647327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Funding of medically-necessary abortions: a reexamination of U.S. law and a call for EC federalism.
Nishi J
Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1992; [1992]():517-38. PubMed ID: 11652961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Doe v. Percy.
U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Fed Suppl; 1979 Sep; 476():324-34. PubMed ID: 11648353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
Finn J
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
