These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648349)
61. New York v. Sullivan. U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Fed Report; 1989 Nov; 889():401-18. PubMed ID: 11648392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. State. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1980 Jan; 612():359-63. PubMed ID: 11648350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Jones v. Smith. U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida Fed Suppl; 1979 Jul; 474():1160-72. PubMed ID: 11648523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last? Casurella JG; Schrock CT Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. The future of abortion. McDaniel A Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Planned Parenthood, Sioux Falls Clinic v. Miller. U.S. District Court, D. South Dakota, W.D Fed Suppl; 1994 Aug; 860():1409-21. PubMed ID: 11648420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City v. Ashcroft. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1981 Jul; 655():848-78. PubMed ID: 11648459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Rust v. Sullivan: triumph of the right over reason. Call EC J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Winter; 31(1):123-42. PubMed ID: 11656449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Fargo Women's Health Organization v. Schafer. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1994 Feb; 18():526-40. PubMed ID: 11648623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Carhart v. Stenberg. U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska Fed Suppl; 1997 Aug; 972():507-31. PubMed ID: 11648431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. The woman's right to know: a model approach to the informed consent of abortion. Renfer SO; Shaheen R; Hegarty M Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1991; 22(2):409-43. PubMed ID: 11651345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Informed consent to abortion: a refinement. Jipping TL Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1987-1988 Winter; 38(3):329-86. PubMed ID: 11659038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. Rosen. U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D Fed Suppl; 1986 Apr; 633():1123-45. PubMed ID: 11648374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma. Eller TR Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996; 71(4):639-70. PubMed ID: 11660407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Doe v. Bridgeton Hospital Association, Inc. New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division Atl Report; 1979 Jun; 403():965-6. PubMed ID: 11648361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Zbaraz v. Hartigan. U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D Fed Suppl; 1984 May; 584():1452-71. PubMed ID: 11648389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law. Berlin SI Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Reproduction and the law. Erickson NS Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 11649200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]