149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648358)
21. Constitutional law--denial of state Medicaid funds for abortions not 'medically necessary' does not violate the equal protection clause.
Barber CK
Howard Law J; 1978; 21(3):937-54. PubMed ID: 11663935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of recent Medicaid decisions on a constitutional right: abortions only for the rich?
Lalli MA
Fordham Urban Law J; 1978; 6(3):687-710. PubMed ID: 11663905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Reproductive Health Services v. Freeman.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Fed Report; 1980 Jan; 614():585-601. PubMed ID: 11648325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Unburdening the undue burden standard: orienting Casey in constitutional jurisprudence.
Metzger GE
Columbia Law Rev; 1994; 94():2025-89. PubMed ID: 11660149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
Erca A
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. New York v. Sullivan.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Fed Report; 1989 Nov; 889():401-18. PubMed ID: 11648392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Gray AD
Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Denial of public funds for nontherapeutic abortions.
Stingle KD
Conn Law Rev; 1978; 10(2):487-510. PubMed ID: 11663904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
Butler PA
Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
Finn J
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Government funding in Title X projects: circumscribing the constitutional rights of the indigent: Rust v. Sullivan.
Maher L
Calif West Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):143-82. PubMed ID: 11656260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Abortion on demand in a post-Wade context: must the state pay the bills?
Fordham Law Rev; 1973; 41(4):921-44. PubMed ID: 11661025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Barnett BA
Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues.
Yarbrough TE
North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Amendment No. 336.
Bartlett DF
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Funding of medically-necessary abortions: a reexamination of U.S. law and a call for EC federalism.
Nishi J
Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1992; [1992]():517-38. PubMed ID: 11652961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Hope Medical Group for Women v. Edwards.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Fed Report; 1998 Sep; 63():418-29. PubMed ID: 11648424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
Henry KS
Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Roe v. Norton. 31 Dec 1975.
U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
Fed Suppl; 1975; 408():660-5. PubMed ID: 11645998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The nature of the right to an abortion: a commentary on Professor Brownstein's analysis of Casey.
West RL
Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):961-7. PubMed ID: 11656423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
