These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648369)

  • 1. Pilgrim Medical Group v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners.
    U.S. District Court, D. New Jersey
    Fed Suppl; 1985 Jul; 613():837-49. PubMed ID: 11648369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1988 Jul; 851():1071-85. PubMed ID: 11648383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Missouri, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1987 Mar; 655():1300-22. PubMed ID: 11648372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. People v. Frey.
    Illinois. Supreme Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1973 Mar; 294():257-9. PubMed ID: 12041231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Doe v. Bridgeton Hospital Association, Inc.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division
    Atl Report; 1979 Jun; 403():965-6. PubMed ID: 11648361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women's Medical Center of Providence v. Roberts.
    U.S. District Court, D. Rhode Island
    Fed Suppl; 1981 Apr; 512():316-25. PubMed ID: 11648519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Jane L. v. Bangerter.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ragsdale v. Turnock.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D
    Fed Suppl; 1985 Nov; 625():1212-31. PubMed ID: 11648365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1989 Jul; 109():3040-85. PubMed ID: 12041289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
    Finn J
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sojourner T v. Edwards.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1992 Sep; 974():27-32. PubMed ID: 11648404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Baird v. Department of Public Health.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    Fed Report; 1979 Jun; 599():1098-103. PubMed ID: 11648332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The woman's right to know: a model approach to the informed consent of abortion.
    Renfer SO; Shaheen R; Hegarty M
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1991; 22(2):409-43. PubMed ID: 11651345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
    Fed Suppl; 1993 May; 822():227-39. PubMed ID: 11648410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City v. Ashcroft.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1983 Jun; 462():476-505. PubMed ID: 12041276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constitutional law--abortion--a requirement that "all" second trimester abortions shall be performed in a hospital is unconstitutional--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 51 U.S.L.W. 4767 (June 15, 1983).
    Colbert J
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1983 Fall-1984 Spring; 9(1-2):144-65. PubMed ID: 11655796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations.
    Baldwin ML
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evans v. Kelley.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
    Fed Suppl; 1997 Jul; 977():1283-320. PubMed ID: 11648432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
    Erca A
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.