These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648377)
1. Portland Feminist Women's Health Center v. Advocates for Life. U.S. District Court, D. Oregon Fed Suppl; 1988 Mar; 681():688-92. PubMed ID: 11648377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New York State National Organization for Women v. Terry. U.S. District Court, S.D. New York Fed Suppl; 1989 Jan; 704():1247-64. PubMed ID: 11648386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Women's Health Services v. Maher. U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut Fed Suppl; 1981 May; 514():265-76. PubMed ID: 11648347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frisby v. Schultz, 27 June 1988. United States. Supreme Court Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():43. PubMed ID: 12289566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. Colker R Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Women's Medical Center of Providence v. Roberts. U.S. District Court, D. Rhode Island Fed Suppl; 1981 Apr; 512():316-25. PubMed ID: 11648519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fargo Women's Health Organization v. Larson. North Dakota. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1986 Jan; 381():176-83. PubMed ID: 12041167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. National Organization for Women v. Operation Rescue. U.S. District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division Fed Suppl; 1989 Dec; 726():1483-98. PubMed ID: 11648390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. E.R.A. and abortion: really separate issues? Johnson D; Cunningham PC America (NY); 1984 Jun; 150(22):432-7. PubMed ID: 11658432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Northeast Women's Center v. McMonagle, 2 March 1989. United States. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():38-9. PubMed ID: 12344404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden. United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 379():531-57. PubMed ID: 16477726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion rights in America. Bullock JR Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Florida Women's Medical Clinic v. Smith. U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida, N.D Fed Suppl; 1982 Mar; 536():1048-65. PubMed ID: 11648334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion and dialogue. Colker R Tulane Law Rev; 1989 Jun; 63(6):1363-403. PubMed ID: 11659218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Notes from the field: a reply to Professor Colker. Burns SE Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():189-206. PubMed ID: 11656054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law. Cica N Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real. Pine RN; Law SA Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The applicability of section 241 of the Ku Klux Klan acts to obstruct or preclude access to abortion. Copelon R Natl Black Law J; 1987; 10(2):183-99. PubMed ID: 11655895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one. Estrich SR; Sullivan KM Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics. Tatalovich R; Daynes BW Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]