These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648388)

  • 1. Jacksonville Clergy Consultation Service v. Martinez.
    U.S. District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division
    Fed Suppl; 1989 Feb; 707():1301-5. PubMed ID: 11648388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Zbaraz v. Hartigan.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D
    Fed Suppl; 1984 May; 584():1452-71. PubMed ID: 11648389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planned Parenthood Association of Atlanta Area v. Harris.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
    Fed Suppl; 1987 Sep; 670():971-98. PubMed ID: 11648379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zbaraz v. Hartigan.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    Fed Report; 1985 May; 763():1532-60. PubMed ID: 11648355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scheinberg v. Smith.
    U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division
    Fed Suppl; 1982 Nov; 550():1112-23. PubMed ID: 11648544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wicklund v. Lambert.
    U.S. District Court, D. Montana, Butte Division
    Fed Suppl; 1997 Oct; 979():1285-90. PubMed ID: 11648429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indiana Planned Parenthood Affiliates Association v. Pearson.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    Fed Report; 1983 Aug; 716():1127-44. PubMed ID: 11648507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glick v. McKay.
    U.S. District Court, D. Nevada
    Fed Suppl; 1985 Jul; 616():322-8. PubMed ID: 11648357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Thornburgh.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
    Fed Suppl; 1987 Mar; 656():879-90. PubMed ID: 11648557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hodgson v. Minnesota.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2926-72. PubMed ID: 12041294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Jones v. Smith.
    U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida
    Fed Suppl; 1979 Jul; 474():1160-72. PubMed ID: 11648523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Planned Parenthood of the Blue Ridge v. Camblos.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1997 Jun; 116():707-21. PubMed ID: 11648433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. T.L.J. v. Webster.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1986 Jun; 792():734-40. PubMed ID: 11648368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Zbaraz v. Hartigan.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D
    Fed Suppl; 1991 Oct; 776():375-86. PubMed ID: 11648407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planned Parenthood Association of Atlanta Area v. Miller.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Jun; 934():1462-82. PubMed ID: 11648400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glick v. McKay.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Jun; 937():434-43. PubMed ID: 11648595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causeway Medical Suite v. Ieyoub.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Louisiana
    Fed Suppl; 1995 Oct; 905():360-7. PubMed ID: 11648627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. Rosen.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D
    Fed Suppl; 1986 Apr; 633():1123-45. PubMed ID: 11648374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constitutional law--due process--a state abortion statute that imposes a blanket parental consultation requirement on minors...constitutes a denial of due process.
    Wambeke AM
    J Urban Law; 1980; 57(2):337-63. PubMed ID: 11662839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.