These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648402)
1. Barnes v. Moore. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Aug; 970():12-6. PubMed ID: 11648402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Barnes v. Mississippi. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Fed Report; 1993 May; 992():1335-47. PubMed ID: 11648616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Karlin v. Foust. U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin Fed Suppl; 1997 Oct; 975():1177-235. PubMed ID: 11648430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1993 May; 822():227-39. PubMed ID: 11648410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sojourner T v. Edwards. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Sep; 974():27-32. PubMed ID: 11648404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennnsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Oct; 978():74-8. PubMed ID: 11648602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law. Berlin SI Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1988 Jun; 686():1089-138. PubMed ID: 11648582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preterm Cleveland v. Voinovich. Ohio. Court of Appeals, Franklin County Wests North East Rep; 1993 Jul; 627():570-92. PubMed ID: 12041182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appeals court upholds limits for abortions. Hinds Md N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences. Koslov TI Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi. Jackson CP Temple Law Rev; 1994; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Court gets stark arguments on abortion. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Fed Report; 1995 Aug; 61():1493-505. PubMed ID: 11648625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1990 Aug; 744():1323-98. PubMed ID: 11648591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utah Women's Clinic, Inc. v. Leavitt. U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D. Fed Suppl; 1994 Feb; 844():1482-95. PubMed ID: 11648412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]