These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648405)
21. Baird v. Department of Public Health. U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Fed Report; 1979 Jun; 599():1098-103. PubMed ID: 11648332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1989 Jul; 109():3040-85. PubMed ID: 12041289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington. U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, en banc Fed Report; 1996 Mar; 79():790-859. PubMed ID: 11648417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Carhart v. Stenberg. U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska Fed Suppl; 1997 Aug; 972():507-31. PubMed ID: 11648431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one. Estrich SR; Sullivan KM Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court. Linton PB St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1988 Jul; 851():1071-85. PubMed ID: 11648383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled. Dworkin R Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process. Goldstein RD William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. High Court has several options for new look at abortion right. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 11647437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. "Keep your laws off my body": abortion regulation and the takings clause. Looper-Friedman SE New Engl Law Rev; 1995; 29(2):253-84. PubMed ID: 11656525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron. Coleman JJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction. Patton DE Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Ragsdale v. Turnock. U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Fed Report; 1988 Apr; 841():1358-408. PubMed ID: 11648382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High court asks sharp questions in abortion case. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():A1, B14. PubMed ID: 11646764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Conn v. Conn. Indiana. Court of Appeals, First District Wests North East Rep; 1988 Jul; 525():612-6. PubMed ID: 12041181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law. Berlin SI Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]