171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648430)
1. Karlin v. Foust.
U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Fed Suppl; 1997 Oct; 975():1177-235. PubMed ID: 11648430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Fed Suppl; 1993 May; 822():227-39. PubMed ID: 11648410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Jane L. v. Bangerter.
U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Barnes v. Moore.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Fed Report; 1992 Aug; 970():12-6. PubMed ID: 11648402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Fed Suppl; 1990 Aug; 744():1323-98. PubMed ID: 11648591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Martin PA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
Berlin SI
Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
Koslov TI
Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preterm Cleveland v. Voinovich.
Ohio. Court of Appeals, Franklin County
Wests North East Rep; 1993 Jul; 627():570-92. PubMed ID: 12041182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Jane L. v. Bangerter.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Fed Report; 1995 Aug; 61():1493-505. PubMed ID: 11648625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin v. Doyle.
U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Fed Suppl; 1998 Jun; 9():1033-46. PubMed ID: 11648428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Fed Suppl; 1988 Jun; 686():1089-138. PubMed ID: 11648582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennnsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1992 Oct; 978():74-8. PubMed ID: 11648602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utah Women's Clinic, Inc. v. Leavitt.
U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D.
Fed Suppl; 1994 Feb; 844():1482-95. PubMed ID: 11648412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Barnes v. Mississippi.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Fed Report; 1993 May; 992():1335-47. PubMed ID: 11648616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process.
Goldstein RD
William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Jane L. v. Bangerter.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Fed Report; 1996 Dec; 102():1112-8. PubMed ID: 11648427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
