These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648439)
1. Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Jegley. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eight Circuit Fed Report; 1999 Sep; 192():794-8. PubMed ID: 11648439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eubanks v. Stengel. U.S. District Court, W.D. Kentucky Fed Suppl; 1998 Nov; 28():1024-43. PubMed ID: 11648437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carhart v. Stenberg. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1999 Sep; 192():1142-52. PubMed ID: 11648438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Planned Parenthood of Greater Iowa, Inc. v. Miller. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1999 Sep; 195():386-9. PubMed ID: 11648440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rhode Island Medical Society v. Whitehouse. U.S. District Court, D. Rhode Island Fed Suppl; 1999; 66():288-317. PubMed ID: 15584139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Schulte v. Douglas. U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska Fed Suppl; 1981 Jul; 567():522-9. PubMed ID: 11648342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evans v. Kelley. U.S. District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division Fed Suppl; 1997 Jul; 977():1283-320. PubMed ID: 11648432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right? Barber RA Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's Medical Professional Corporation v. Voinovich. U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Fed Report; 1997 Nov; 130():187-219. PubMed ID: 11648426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Fed Report; 1995 Aug; 61():1493-505. PubMed ID: 11648625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany. Morris DG Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. CRLP in the courts. Kelly M Reprod Freedom News; 1998 Dec; 7(9):6-7. PubMed ID: 12294554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Constitutional law--New Jersey abortion statute unconstitutionally vague on its face. McIntyre AG J Urban Law; 1973 Feb; 50(3):505-13. PubMed ID: 11663518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion and section 7 of the Charter: proposing a constitutionally valid foetal protection law. McCourt KM; Love DJ Manit Law J; 1989; 18(3):365-94. PubMed ID: 11656021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law. Cica N Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's Medical Professional Corporation v. Taft. United States. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Wests Fed Rep; 2003; 353():436-67. PubMed ID: 16477714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Morgentaler decision: Parliament's options. Hovius B Can Fam Law Q; 1988; 3():137-65. PubMed ID: 11659378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1993 May; 822():227-39. PubMed ID: 11648410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Armstrong v. Mazurek. U.S. District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division Fed Suppl; 1995 Sep; 906():561-9. PubMed ID: 11648422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]