332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648487)
1. Rogers v. Okin.
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rivers v. Katz.
New York. Court of Appeals
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Jun; 495():337-45. PubMed ID: 12041209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rogers v. Commissioner of Department of Mental Health.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk
Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Nov; 390():489-513. PubMed ID: 12041109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
Knepper K
Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In re Schmidt.
Minnesota. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1989 Jul; 443():824-30. PubMed ID: 12041163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rennie v. Klein.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 720():266-77. PubMed ID: 11648483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
King P
J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions.
Brooks WM
Touro Law Rev; 1991; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. United States v. Charters.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Fed Report; 1988 Dec; 863():302-15. PubMed ID: 11648570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Jarvis v. Levine.
Minnesota. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1988 Jan; 418():139-50. PubMed ID: 12041142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Constitutional law--an involuntarily committed mental patient has a qualified right to make treatment decisions absent a formal adjudication of incompetence--Rogers v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health.
White AB
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1984; 18(3):503-11. PubMed ID: 11658616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rogers v. Okin. 29 Oct 1979.
U.S. District Court, D. Massachusetts
Fed Suppl; 1979; 478():1342-89. PubMed ID: 11646097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rogers v. Okin.
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Fed Report; 1980 Nov; 634():650-64. PubMed ID: 11648463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Forcible administration of antipsychotic medication. State laws.
Arkin HR
JAMA; 1984 Nov; 252(18):2620-1. PubMed ID: 6149323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
Hahn WA
Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court.
Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The forcible medication of involuntarily committed mental patients with antipsychotic drugs--Rogers v. Okin.
Robinson RM
Georgia Law Rev; 1981; 15(3):739-62. PubMed ID: 11658322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
