These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648489)

  • 1. In re Fadley.
    California. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 1
    Wests Calif Report; 1984 Aug; 205():572-6. PubMed ID: 11648489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In re Guardianship of Ruth E.J.
    Wisconsin. Court of Appeals
    North West Rep Second Ser; 1995 Sep; 540():213-7. PubMed ID: 12041176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lillian F. v. Superior Court (Santa Clara Valley Medical Center).
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1
    Wests Calif Report; 1984 Sep; 206():603-9. PubMed ID: 11648505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Competence to consent to electroconvulsive therapy.
    Martin BA; Bean GJ
    Convuls Ther; 1992 Jun; 8(2):92-102. PubMed ID: 11659635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wardship court enforces treatment.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1991 Aug; 303(6798):332. PubMed ID: 11642904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shock therapy and informed consent.
    Gilbert DT
    Ill Bar J; 1981 Jan; 69(5):272-278, 287. PubMed ID: 11658617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In re Schuoler.
    Washington. Supreme Court
    Pac Rep Second Ser; 1986; 723():1103-11. PubMed ID: 17073033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In re Alleged Mental Illness of Kinzer.
    Minnesota. Court of Appeals
    Wests North West Rep; 1985 Oct; 375():526-33. PubMed ID: 12046576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In re R (A Minor) (Wardship: Consent to Treatment).
    Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal
    Wkly Law Rep; 1991 Jul; 1991 Oct 25():592-608. PubMed ID: 12041269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In re Guardianship of Ingram.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 11644500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regulatory pressures hamper the effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy.
    Johnson SY
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():155-70. PubMed ID: 11659924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Informed consent to organic behavior control.
    Barnhart BA; Pinkerton ML; Roth RT
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1977; 17(1):39-83. PubMed ID: 11664710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In re Branning.
    Illinois. Appellate Court, Fourth District
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1996 Dec; 674():463-72. PubMed ID: 12041226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re K, W and H (Minors) (Medical Treatment).
    Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
    Fam Law Rep; 1992 Sep; 1993():854-9. PubMed ID: 12041092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fleming v. Reid.
    Canada. Ontario. Court of Appeal
    Dom Law Rep; 1991 Jun; 82():298-320. PubMed ID: 12041088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The regulation of electroconvulsive therapy in California: the impact of recent constitutional interpretations.
    Whitcomb D
    Gold Gate Law Rev; 1989; 18(2):469-94. PubMed ID: 11659134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In re Woodall.
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4
    Wests Calif Report; 1989 Apr; 257():601-10. PubMed ID: 11648573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent and the voluntary psychiatric patient.
    Mrazek ML
    Leg Med Q; 1996; 20(Pt.4):13-20. PubMed ID: 11660714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The right to refuse treatment: Commonwealth developments and issues.
    Gordon R; Verdun-Jones SN
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6():57-73. PubMed ID: 11658523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informed decision-making capacity: a patient's ability to participate in treatment determinations.
    Tepper AM; Kaslow FW
    Law Psychol Rev; 1981; 6():49-67. PubMed ID: 11658373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.