These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648491)
1. American College of Obstetricians v. Thornburgh. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1984 May; 737():283-319. PubMed ID: 11648491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion. Kunz KA Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1986 Jun; 106():2169-216. PubMed ID: 12041287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Thornburgh. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1987 Mar; 656():879-90. PubMed ID: 11648557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1988 Jun; 686():1089-138. PubMed ID: 11648582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City v. Ashcroft. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1983 Jun; 462():476-505. PubMed ID: 12041276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote. Taylor S N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The viability of the trimester approach. Calder KA Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1983 Jun; 462():416-75. PubMed ID: 12041275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis. Linton PB Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Fed Report; 1995 Aug; 61():1493-505. PubMed ID: 11648625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law. Berlin SI Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth. 31 Jan 1975. U.S. District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D Fed Suppl; 1975; 392():1362-79. PubMed ID: 11646047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law. Pirner RK; Williams LB Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]