These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648494)
1. Coleman v. Coleman. Maryland. Court of Special Appeals Atl Report; 1984 Mar; 471():1115-21. PubMed ID: 11648494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end? Henry KS Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conn v. Conn. Indiana. Court of Appeals, First District Wests North East Rep; 1988 Jul; 525():612-6. PubMed ID: 12041181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment. Hatch OG Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law. Pirner RK; Williams LB Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion. Kunz KA Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An analysis of the 1974 Massachusetts Abortion Statute and a minor's right to abortion. Malfa KA New Engl Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):417-54. PubMed ID: 11664438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Jones v. Smith. U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida Fed Suppl; 1979 Jul; 474():1160-72. PubMed ID: 11648523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right? Barber RA Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role. Witherspoon JP Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Guam Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Ada. U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Jun; 962():1366-74. PubMed ID: 11648405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law. Berlin SI Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system. Kindregan CP Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Fed Report; 1995 Aug; 61():1493-505. PubMed ID: 11648625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Right to life of the unborn. Garn Je Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Jan; 127(12):S567-78. PubMed ID: 11665256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Roe v. Rampton. 17 Jan 1975. U.S. District Court, D. Utah, Central Division Fed Suppl; 1975; 394():677-93. PubMed ID: 11645995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]