These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648497)
1. Woe v. Cuomo. U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Fed Report; 1984 Feb; 729():96-108. PubMed ID: 11648497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rone v. Fireman. U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D Fed Suppl; 1979 Jun; 473():92-135. PubMed ID: 11648522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scott v. Plante. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1982 Oct; 691():634-9. PubMed ID: 11648511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients. Belzer I UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Doe by Roe v. Gaughan. U.S. District Court, D. Massachusetts Fed Suppl; 1985 Sep; 617():1477-88. PubMed ID: 11648529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rogers v. Okin. U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. E.H. v. Matin. West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals South East Report Second Ser; 1981 Nov; 284():232-41. PubMed ID: 12041312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill. Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure? Miller HL Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Philipp v. Carey. U.S. District Court, N.D. New York Fed Suppl; 1981 Jun; 517():513-21. PubMed ID: 11648517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The new Ohio Mental Health Act. Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1984 Jan; 465():89-167. PubMed ID: 12041274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wyatt v. King. U.S. District Court, M.D. Alabama, N.D Fed Suppl; 1992 May; 793():1058-79. PubMed ID: 11648254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom. Concemi M Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Project Release v. Prevost. U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 722():960-81. PubMed ID: 11648484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stensvad v. Reivitz. U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin Fed Suppl; 1985 Jan; 601():128-32. PubMed ID: 11648509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment. Morris GH Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Court allows holding of mental patients who may cause trouble. Sullivan R N Y Times Web; 1994 Dec; ():59. PubMed ID: 11646322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment. Roth LH Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]