These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648499)
1. Brown v. Jensen. U.S. District Court, D. Colorado Fed Suppl; 1983 Oct; 572():193-200. PubMed ID: 11648499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stensvad v. Reivitz. U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin Fed Suppl; 1985 Jan; 601():128-32. PubMed ID: 11648509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Schmidt. Minnesota. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1989 Jul; 443():824-30. PubMed ID: 12041163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Constitutional requirements in the commitment of the mentally ill in the U.S.A.: rights to liberty and therapy. Flaschner FN Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 1974; 18(3):283-301. PubMed ID: 11664409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Project Release v. Prevost. U.S. District Court, E.D. New York Fed Suppl; 1982 Nov; 551():1298-310. PubMed ID: 11648548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Birl v. Wallis. U.S. District Court, M.D. Alabama, N.D Fed Suppl; 1985 Sep; 619():481-93. PubMed ID: 11648532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In search of a sane commitment statute. Treffert DA; Krajeck RW Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Project Release v. Prevost. U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 722():960-81. PubMed ID: 11648484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom. Concemi M Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo. Smith GG Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Lessard v. Schmidt: due process and involuntary civil commitment. Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(3):585-642. PubMed ID: 11664292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Doe by Roe v. Gaughan. U.S. District Court, D. Massachusetts Fed Suppl; 1985 Sep; 617():1477-88. PubMed ID: 11648529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Woe v. Cuomo. U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Fed Report; 1984 Feb; 729():96-108. PubMed ID: 11648497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rone v. Fireman. U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D Fed Suppl; 1979 Jun; 473():92-135. PubMed ID: 11648522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients. Belzer I UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rogers v. Okin. U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mental disabilities law issues. Epstein JM Colo Lawyer; 1977 Dec; 6(12):2163-8. PubMed ID: 11663038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute. Vater JA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]