These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648501)

  • 21. The dangerous patient exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege: the Tarasoff duty and the Jaffee footnote.
    Harris GC
    Wash Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 74(1):33-68. PubMed ID: 11865923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Constitutional privacy in psychotherapy.
    Smith SR
    George Washington Law Rev; 1980 Nov; 49(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 11658268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Psychotherapist responsibility in notifying individuals at risk for exposure to HIV.
    Girardi JA; Keese RM; Traver LB; Cooksey DR
    J Sex Res; 1988 Feb; 25(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 11659081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Payton v. Weaver.
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1
    Wests Calif Report; 1982 Apr; 182():225-31. PubMed ID: 11648482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Status of the emergency room psychotherapist: privacy rites.
    Heimberg SA
    UCLA Law Rev; 1983 Aug; 30(6):1316-48. PubMed ID: 11649584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In re Jarvis.
    Minnesota. Court of Appeals
    Wests North West Rep; 1988 Dec; 433():120-4. PubMed ID: 12041143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In re Woodall.
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4
    Wests Calif Report; 1989 Apr; 257():601-10. PubMed ID: 11648573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The psychiatric duty to warn: walking a tightrope of uncertainty.
    McClarren GM
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1987; 56(1):269-93. PubMed ID: 11658955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tarasoff: five years later.
    Knapp S; Vandecreek L
    Prof Psychol; 1982 Aug; 13(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 11658658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of empathy in forensic examinations.
    Shuman DW
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(3 and 4):289-302. PubMed ID: 11659813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Case underlines psychiatric issue: to keep confidences or report threats.
    Marcus FF
    N Y Times Web; 1986 May; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11646505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In re Fadley.
    California. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 1
    Wests Calif Report; 1984 Aug; 205():572-6. PubMed ID: 11648489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Warning third parties: the ripple effects of Tarasoff.
    Rosenhan DL; Teitelbaum TW; Teitelbaum KW; Davidson M
    Pac Law J; 1993 Apr; 24(3):1165-232. PubMed ID: 11660219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Another courtroom assault on the confidentiality of the psychotherapist-patient relationship.
    Leong GB; Silva JA; Weinstock R
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 Sep; 40(5):862-4. PubMed ID: 7595331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Psychotherapist-patient privilege--patient's dangerous condition--confidentiality--legal duty to warn potential victim.
    Burns RE
    Akron Law Rev; 1975; 9(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 11664482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lillian F. v. Superior Court (Santa Clara Valley Medical Center).
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1
    Wests Calif Report; 1984 Sep; 206():603-9. PubMed ID: 11648505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Court rulings on psychotherapists.
    Kermani EJ
    Am J Psychother; 1982 Apr; 36(2):248-55. PubMed ID: 7102845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Keyhea v. Rushen.
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5
    Wests Calif Report; 1986 Mar; 223():746-55. PubMed ID: 11648546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estate of Urbaniak v. Newton.
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1
    Wests Calif Report; 1991 Jan; 277():354-63. PubMed ID: 11648594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mahoney v. Lensink.
    Connecticut. Supreme Court
    Atl Report; 1990 Jan; 569():518-31. PubMed ID: 11648586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.