203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648511)
1. Scott v. Plante.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1982 Oct; 691():634-9. PubMed ID: 11648511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Youngberg v. Romeo.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1982 Jun; 457():307-31. PubMed ID: 12041273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Romeo, Romeo, where art thou Romeo: before the court at the mercy of institutional professionals.
Meyer SM; Soskin RM
J Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(2):205-22. PubMed ID: 11658596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Romeo v. Youngberg.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1980 Nov; 644():147-86. PubMed ID: 11648465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. High court establishes rights for retarded in institutions.
Barbash F
Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11647762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court.
Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rennie v. Klein.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 720():266-77. PubMed ID: 11648483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Woe v. Cuomo.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Fed Report; 1984 Feb; 729():96-108. PubMed ID: 11648497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo.
Smith GG
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded.
Gallo LV
Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Court bolsters mental patients' rights.
Herbert W
Sci News; 1982 Jun; 121(26):420. PubMed ID: 11658305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rone v. Fireman.
U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D
Fed Suppl; 1979 Jun; 473():92-135. PubMed ID: 11648522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1984 Jan; 465():89-167. PubMed ID: 12041274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mahoney v. Lensink.
Connecticut. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1990 Jan; 569():518-31. PubMed ID: 11648586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rogers v. Okin.
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abandoned but not forgotten: the illegal confinement of elderly people in state psychiatric institutions.
Kanter AS
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19():273-307. PubMed ID: 11659687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Doe by Roe v. Gaughan.
U.S. District Court, D. Massachusetts
Fed Suppl; 1985 Sep; 617():1477-88. PubMed ID: 11648529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Birl v. Wallis.
U.S. District Court, M.D. Alabama, N.D.
Fed Suppl; 1986 Apr; 633():707-12. PubMed ID: 11648554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Doe v. Public Health Trust of Dade County.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Fed Report; 1983 Jan; 696():901-11. PubMed ID: 11648502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Project Release v. Prevost.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 722():960-81. PubMed ID: 11648484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
