These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648513)

  • 1. Doe v. Pickett.
    U.S. District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington Division
    Fed Suppl; 1979 Nov; 480():1218-23. PubMed ID: 11648513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Planned Parenthood Association of Utah v. Dandoy.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1987 Feb; 810():984-8. PubMed ID: 11648555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utah and publicly funded contraceptive services: the struggle to prevent minors from sponging off the government.
    Chitwood M
    J Contemp Law; 1987; 13(2):277-300. PubMed ID: 11658998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Jane Does v. State of Utah Department of Health.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1985 Oct; 776():253-6. PubMed ID: 11648531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unemancipated minors' rights of access to contraceptives without parental consent or notice--the squeal rule and beyond.
    Best M
    Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 1983; 8(2):219-50. PubMed ID: 11658756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. T.H. v. Jones. 23 Jul 1975.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1975; 425():873-90. PubMed ID: 11646068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Planned Parenthood Association of Utah v. Dandoy.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1986 May; 635():184-90. PubMed ID: 11648550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
    Wardle LD
    Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Taking a lesson from England: the contraceptive controversy.
    Mitchell MJ
    Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1987; 9(2):499-522. PubMed ID: 11658961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power.
    Paul EW; Klassel D
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causeway Medical Suite v. Ieyoub.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Louisiana
    Fed Suppl; 1995 Oct; 905():360-7. PubMed ID: 11648627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The law of fertility regulation in the United States: a 1980 review.
    Isaacs SL
    J Fam Law; 1980-1981; 19(1):65-96. PubMed ID: 11663114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
    Frame DW
    West VA Law Rev; 1983; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts v. Bellotti.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    Fed Report; 1989 Feb; 868():459-73. PubMed ID: 11648577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Easing restrictions on minors' abortion rights.
    O'Keeffe J; Jones JM
    Issues Sci Technol; 1990; 7(4):74-80. PubMed ID: 11659333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parental notification requirements applicable to projects for family planning services; final rule.
    U.S. Public Health Service
    Fed Regist; 1983 Jan; 48(18):3600-14. PubMed ID: 11645488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constitutional law--due process--a state abortion statute that imposes a blanket parental consultation requirement on minors...constitutes a denial of due process.
    Wambeke AM
    J Urban Law; 1980; 57(2):337-63. PubMed ID: 11662839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A disturbing judgment by the Court of Appeal.
    Lancet; 1985 Jan; 1(8419):24-5. PubMed ID: 11644441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. State of New York v. Schweiker.
    U.S. District Court, S.D. New York
    Fed Suppl; 1983 Feb; 557():354-63. PubMed ID: 11648206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
    Embree MG; Dobson TA
    Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.