These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648514)
21. A comparative study of the law relating to the physician's duty to obtain the patient's "informed consent" to medical treatment in England and California. Churchward AB Conn J Int Law; 1990; 5(2):483-563. PubMed ID: 11659375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Crain v. Allison. District of Columbia. Court of Appeals Atl Report; 1982 Apr; 443():558-66. PubMed ID: 11648159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance? Teff H Law Q Rev; 1985 Jul; 101():432-53. PubMed ID: 11658726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Consent to medical treatment in Canada. Picard EI Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas. Cluff CA Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Informed choice: physicians' duty to disclose nonreadily available alternatives. Terrion HF Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1993; 43(2):491-523. PubMed ID: 11659829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes. Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Beyond Bolam: responding to the patient. Feenan DK Med Law Int; 1994; 1(2):177-93. PubMed ID: 11653113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Family accuses doctors of failing to warn of risk. Dyer C BMJ; 1997 Apr; 314(7089):1224. PubMed ID: 11644924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Kelly v. Hazlett. 29 Jul 1976. Ontario. High Court of Justice Dom Law Rep; 1976; ():. PubMed ID: 12038305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Rogers v. Whitaker. Australia. High Court Aust Law J; 1993 Jan; 67(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 11648609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Arato v. Avedon. California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3 Wests Calif Report; 1992 Aug; 11():169-88. PubMed ID: 11648615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Perna v. Pirozzi. New Jersey. Supreme Court Rep Cases Argued Determ Supreme Court N J N J Supreme Court; 1983 Mar; 92():446-66. PubMed ID: 12041106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. From informed consent to patient choice: a new protected interest. Shultz MM Yale Law J; 1985 Dec; 95(2):219-99. PubMed ID: 11658859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Cheung v. Cunningham. New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division Atl Report; 1987 Jan; 520():832-7. PubMed ID: 11648565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Medical decision-making: patient participation. Wolfgarten A; Khan A Med Leg J; 1984; 52(Pt. 3):180-90. PubMed ID: 11649586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Halligan PD LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Hook v. Rothstein. South Carolina. Court of Appeals South East Report Second Ser; 1984 Apr; 316():690-705. PubMed ID: 12041306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Informed consent: a changing standard of disclosure. Eslami M Conn Med; 1984 Jun; 48(6):407. PubMed ID: 11644146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]