These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648539)
1. Conservatorship of Valerie N. California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4 Wests Calif Report; 1983 May; 191():283-90. PubMed ID: 11648539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Hillstrom. Minnesota. Court of Appeals Wests North West Rep; 1985 Mar; 363():871-7. PubMed ID: 12041161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modern judicial treatment of procreative rights of developmentally disabled persons: equal rights to procreation and sterilization. Jaegers EM J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Fall; 31(4):947-79. PubMed ID: 11660196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore. Gauvey SK; Shuger NB Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Matter of Moe. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester North East Rep Second Ser; 1982 Mar; 432():712-24. PubMed ID: 12041253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sterilization of mentally retarded persons: reproductive rights and family privacy. Scott ES Duke Law J; 1986 Nov; 1986(5):806-65. PubMed ID: 11658848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Maxon v. Superior Court. California. Court of Appeal, Third District Rep Cases Determ Court Appeal State Calif; 1982 Sep; 135():626-34. PubMed ID: 12041101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Motes v. Hall County. Georgia. Supreme Court Rep Cases Decided Supreme Court State Ga Ga Supreme Court; 1983 Sep; 251():373-5. PubMed ID: 12041501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. American Academy of Pediatrics v. Lungren. California. Supreme Court Wests Pac Report; 1996 Apr; 912():1148-98. PubMed ID: 12041329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Involuntary sterilization of mentally disabled women. Cepko R Berkeley Womens Law J; 1993; 8():122-65. PubMed ID: 11659702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Balancing the right of the mentally retarded to obtain a therapeutic sterilization against the potential for abuse. Irvine AC Law Psychol Rev; 1988; 12():95-122. PubMed ID: 11660733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Guardianship of Eberhardy: the sterilization of the mentally retarded. Derouin J Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1199-227. PubMed ID: 11651835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The conflict between "disabling" and "enabling" paradigms in law: sterilization, the developmentally disabled, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Dugan JC Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 78(3):507-42. PubMed ID: 11659683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Re Eve. Canada. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1986 Oct; 31():1-37. PubMed ID: 12041087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Debra B.: the best interest standard in court-authorized sterilization of the mentally retarded. Donahue SM Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):209-32. PubMed ID: 11652532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Zbaraz v. Hartigan. U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D Fed Suppl; 1984 May; 584():1452-71. PubMed ID: 11648389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Guardianship of Matejski. Iowa. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1988 Feb; 419():576-82. PubMed ID: 12041141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In re Truesdell. North Carolina. Court of Appeals South East Report Second Ser; 1983 Jul; 304():793-813. PubMed ID: 12041322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In re Grady--voluntary sterilization and the retarded. Denkin JF Rutgers Law Rev; 1982; 34(3):567-90. PubMed ID: 11658757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]