These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648545)
21. United States v. Charters. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Fed Report; 1988 Dec; 863():302-15. PubMed ID: 11648570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1984 Jan; 465():89-167. PubMed ID: 12041274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bee v. Greaves. U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Fed Report; 1984 Sep; 744():1387-97. PubMed ID: 11648528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The administration of psychotropic drugs to prisoners: state of the law and beyond. Floyd J Calif Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 78(5):1243-85. PubMed ID: 11659407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Reevaluating substantive due process as a source of protection for psychiatric patients to refuse drugs. Brooks WM Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):937-1017. PubMed ID: 15386905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. In re Savage. New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division Atl Report; 1989 May; 558():1357-63. PubMed ID: 11648581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Court upholds forced treatment of mentally ill by prison officials. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1990 Feb; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 11647879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. United States v. Bryant. U.S. District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division Fed Suppl; 1987 Mar; 670():840-5. PubMed ID: 11648564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The 1983 revision of the Texas mental health code. Dix GE St Marys Law J; 1984; 16(1):41-153. PubMed ID: 11658786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Court allows holding of mental patients who may cause trouble. Sullivan R N Y Times Web; 1994 Dec; ():59. PubMed ID: 11646322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Control, custody, care, treatment and instruction of inmates; administrative safeguards for psychiatric treatment and medication; interim rule. U.S. Bureau of Prisons Fed Regist; 1992 Nov; 57(219):53820-1. PubMed ID: 11645752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill. Stromberg CD; Stone AA Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Hawley v. Evans. U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division Fed Suppl; 1989 Jul; 716():601-14. PubMed ID: 11648188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada. Gutierrez L Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Ohlinger v. Watson. U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Fed Report; 1981 Jul; 652():775-80. PubMed ID: 11648478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]