BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648556)

  • 21. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
    Zaremba JF
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Suicidal competence and the patient's right to refuse lifesaving treatment.
    Matthews MA
    Calif Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 75(2):707-58. PubMed ID: 11652518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
    Cantor NL
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In re Conroy.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division
    Atl Report; 1983 Jul; 464():303-15. PubMed ID: 11648239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I.
    Solnick PB
    Med Law; 1984 Sep; 3(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 11651779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In the matter of Beverly Requena.
    Nimz M
    Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 11644091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In re Requena.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division
    Atl Report; 1986 Oct; 517():869-70. PubMed ID: 11648173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Life-and-death decisions.
    Washington Post; 1985 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11646411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. State v. McAfee.
    Georgia. Supreme Court
    Wests South East Report; 1989 Nov; 385():651-3. PubMed ID: 12041304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
    Colabrese CA
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is there a constitutional right to die?
    Wickett A
    Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 11649799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bouvia v. County of Riverside.
    California. Superior Court, County of Riverside
    Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):485-91. PubMed ID: 11644050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
    Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
    KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections.
    Kadish SH
    Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Self-directed death, euthanasia, and the termination of life-support: reasonable decisions to die.
    Neeley GS
    Campbell Law Rev; 1994; 16(2):205-29. PubMed ID: 11660027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vacco v. Quill.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1997 Jun; 117():2293-312. PubMed ID: 12041285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Euthanasia and self determinism: is there a Charter right to die in Canada?
    Carnerie F
    McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):299-335. PubMed ID: 11649872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment.
    Dooling RP
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):895-918. PubMed ID: 11649881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, en banc
    Fed Report; 1996 Mar; 79():790-859. PubMed ID: 11648417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
    Buchanan AE
    UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.